Dear
Professor Werner,
I included the three projects we
completed this semester in my portfolio. The first is a narrative essay
describing my personal writing process entitled, “Getting from Blue to Black.”
The second piece is a rhetorical song analysis entitled, “Breaking Free of the
Cage.” My final piece is an analytical research paper exploring the conventions
of contemporary theatre entitled, “The Performer with the Audience: An Exploration of Contemporary Theatre.” Each
one of these pieces is quite different, but each has taught me very important writing
techniques and conventions. While writing, I was not surprised that I found
rhetorical analysis somewhat difficult; establishing a clear argument,
especially when using source quotes as support, has always been a challenge for
me. But these pieces allowed me to grow and cultivate skills to make my
rhetoric stronger.
My first essay was very exciting to
complete. It was in this initial piece where I was able to discover my own
personal voice as a writer. I think if I were to revise this piece again, I
would include more concrete examples of my outlining process; my description of
this process can be quite confusing in places because I outline in a very
unique way. Therefore, more concrete examples may have helped clarify my
process. Exploring my own writing process felt very autobiographical in a
strange sense, but was also a valuable opportunity to take an in-depth look at
my technique, so that I may be aware of what needs improvement as I continued
through the semester.
While I feel that my second piece
was the weakest of the three, it was one of the most eye-opening. I believe
that this piece was the weakest because I was unable to effectively analyze the
song I chose, even after one revision. I believe that it was eye-opening
because I found that analysis was a lot more challenging to master than I
believed it to be. I found myself describing the song lyrics more often than I
was analyzing them. If I would revise this paper again, I would be sure to take
a closer look at my analysis, and frame a very distinct argument so that it
would be necessary for my rhetoric to be very detailed and specific.
I believe that my third essay was my
strongest piece. It also proved to the most difficult because research was
scarce to create an effective argument. However, I was able to hone in my
thesis to one piece of theatre that I believed encapsulated contemporary
theatre, and proved how it did so. I was most passionate about the topic of
this final piece, and therefore, had great motivation to establish a clear and
effective stance in the issue. I am excited to continue work on this piece
because I believe there is much more to be explored in the world of
contemporary theatre, and the best way to do so is to learn directly from the
source – theatre artists of today. I look forward to seeing where my further
research and writing takes me with this project.
Overall, I believe that my biggest
hurdle was establishing a clear and effective position in my writing. Establishing
a strong argument is something I still need to work on, but I believe I was
able to improve greatly in rhetorical analysis as the semester progressed. And I
believe each of my pieces display that progress.
Sincerely,
Jackie Marschke
No comments:
Post a Comment